Hi Reader -

There’s a 5-step death spiral that kills subscription apps trying to break past $100k/month.

And the brutal part? Every single step feels like the responsible call. Every decision sounds smart in the meeting. Everyone nods along.

That’s what makes it so lethal.

Let me walk you through how it happens.

$50k/month: Everything’s working.

You tested your way here. Found some winners. Scaled them hard.

You’re pumping out 15-20 ads a month, creative velocity is humming, performance is strong.

This is the high point. You did everything right to get here.

Pushing to $150k: Performance dips.

You’re scaling. Creative production is up to 30-40 ads a month. You’re doing everything you’re supposed to do.

Then CPAs spike 20-30%. First doubt creeps in.

Someone in a meeting: usually someone senior, usually someone who sounds very reasonable, says:

“let’s pause new creative and double down on what’s already working. We’re spending $150k/month and things are breaking. This isn’t the time to experiment.”

Sounds responsible. Sounds prudent. Everyone nods because nobody wants to be the person who kept spending on “experiments” while the account was on fire.

This is the first mistake. You just stopped doing the exact thing that will get you out of your CPA spike.

$150k/month: The account concentrates.

Creative production drops from 30-40 ads a month to 15-20. Then down to 3-4.

“Just until things stabilize.”

The justifications come fast:

• “Let’s stay true to our brand.”
• “Let’s stop experimenting and focus on what we know works.”
• And the most seductive one: “Every time we experiment, performance goes down.”

That last one’s my favorite. Of course performance goes down when you experiment. That’s what experimentation is. BUT the experiments are what lead to winners.

But try explaining that when the ‘concerned’ person is panicking - and refusing to test creatives.

So now you’ve got $150k/month running through 4-5 creatives.

Nothing in the pipeline behind them. The whole account is balancing on a handful of ads that are getting more fatigued by the day.

The ‘concerned’ person says: “oh, we just need to find 1-2 more winners and we’ll be fine!”

Numbers look stable. For now.

You’re standing on a trapdoor and you don’t even know it.

Then a winner dies.

Your top creative finally fatigues. The one that’s been carrying 40% of the account for the last six weeks.

The one everyone assumed would just keep working forever because, hey, it’s been working forever.

Its CPA goes crazy.

You wait, hoping it goes down. Nopes.

You’ve got to pause it.

At $50k/month, losing your best ad is a bad week. You scramble, you find something else, you recover. No big deal.

At $150k/month? That’s $3,000-$5,000 a day evaporating overnight. Gone. And there’s nothing behind it.

The pipeline you were supposed to be building? Empty.

The diversification you were supposed to maintain? A distant memory.

Performance doesn’t dip this time. It falls off a cliff.

The most dangerous words in paid ads.

The team huddles. Panic sets in. And then someone: probably the same person who suggested pausing experiments in the first place: says the words that seal the spiral:

“Nothing’s working. Let’s slow down and focus on quality over quantity.”

Ah yes. Quality over quantity. The rallying cry of teams who are about to make things much, much worse.

Fewer ads. Higher stakes on each one. More pressure on every single creative to be the next savior.

And because nothing can live up to that pressure, the spiral restarts. Worse position. Higher spend. Further to fall.

Every step along the way felt like the smart, responsible move.

That’s the trap.

Here’s the good news: the spiral only works when you can’t see it.

Now you can see it.

And the way out is the opposite of every instinct you’ll have at each step:

Performance dips? Increase creative production, not decrease it. I know it feels insane. Do it anyway.

Account concentrating? Diversify formats and angles. Don’t double down on what’s already carrying too much weight.

Winner dies? That’s expected when you have 30 ads running. It’s a five-alarm fire when you have 3.

The dip isn’t telling you to slow down. It’s not a signal to be more careful, more selective, more “focused.”

It’s telling you to build the system that makes slowing down unnecessary.

If you are spending $50k+/mo and if you want to talk about how to build that system before the trapdoor opens, reply “SPIRAL” and we’ll chat.

Or don’t. The spiral will wait. It’s patient like that.

Later,

Shamanth

PS: some goodies from our socials below.

​I was managing $1.75mm a month in ad spend.​

​"You need to find a winning ad"​

​Speechify makes $2mm/mo for its text-to-speech ‘reading’ app. ​

​"Be an Alpha Man." It's a reading app.​

​October 2024: "Ads in AI are uniquely unsettling to me."​

​If I could only fix ONE thing to grow a subscription app…​

​When I spoke with Lomit Patel, CMO at Try Your Best (TYB), he clarified something important about AI:​

​Ladder was Apple's App of the Year 2025 finalist.​