|
Hi Reader - “How did you go bankrupt?”
“Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.”
That’s Hemingway. 1926. Accounts are the same way. Some crash overnight, some bleed out over weeks while you sit there thinking everything’s fine. Same cause either way: staring at the wrong numbers while the whole thing quietly falls apart. We've come close to the brink on 3 accounts. Each time, the warning signs were there for weeks. Each time, we nearly missed them. The overnight crash. Account cruising at $10k/day with one ad doing all the heavy lifting. Dashboard looked beautiful. Then it slipped - and when one ad carries everything, “slipped” turns into “on fire” real fast. The slow bleed. Subscription app where cost per trial was rock solid while ROAS quietly bled out. Dashboard said everything was fine. Dashboard was lying. Took statistical analysis to figure out what was actually happening. Yes, stats. We’re those people now. The silent killer. Great ad, great metrics, a “winner” by every measure anyone bothers to check. Except downstream retention was garbage. A magnet for users who’d never pay. A win that was slowly poisoning the product. Different symptoms, same disease: concentration. And the annoying part is that concentration feels smart. Feels like focus. It’s actually a bomb with a timer you can’t see. After these 3 near-misses seared into my mind the dangers of concentration in different flavors, I decided we'd make creative diversity a cornerstone of everything we do. Not because Meta said 'Andromeda' - but creative diversity as insurance against things blowing up. And we track this in our key dashboards(even when, especially when Meta doesnt surface these by themselves) - that is how critical diversity is to everything we do. Here are just a few things we track.
...and a LOT LOT more(below is a small subset of the metrics we track in our internal dashboards). This is what we're looking at every week while most people are refreshing their ROAS and tweaking bid caps. Different view, different game. This isn't optional for us. This is the work that actually moves the business forward. Not the sexy stuff: the stuff that keeps accounts alive when things get weird. And things always get weird eventually. None of this is in ads manager. Unlikely it ever will be: Meta's pushing for automation and concentration, not diversification(notice how Meta reps talk about account consolidation in one breath and creative diversity in the next one? LOL). Anyway, if you're spending over $50k/mo and want to scale in a way that diversifies your risks and creative, hit reply and say "DASHBOARD". (Or don't. Ads manager will still be there tomorrow). Later, Shamanth PS: From the socials: 2013, early advertiser on Facebook install ads. I scaled an app to $1.5M/month in ad spend. |
Intelligent Artifice features hard won insights from the front-lines of performance marketing in a Generative AI world - delivered straight into your inbox. For free.
Hi Reader - Last week I wrote about the AI creative strategy agent we open-sourced and why it doesn't replace humans. One of the questions we got on the post was: How do you feed back performance? Short answer: same shape as the agent. The longer answer is more interesting, because performance analysis isn't actually one job. It's two completely different jobs at two completely different altitudes, and most teams treat it as one and end up doing neither well. Both altitudes can run...
Hi Reader - We open-sourced our AI creative strategy agent last week, and I was actually a little nervous about it. Because a lot of people would be thinking - if not saying this. "Great. Now you can fire half your creative team, right?" That's the assumption baked into every "AI agent" launch on LinkedIn right now. You plug it in, watch the headcount line on the org chart get a little shorter, and spend an extra five minutes on the beach. The honest answer is no. The opposite, actually. And...
Hi Reader - The booster rockets on the entire United States Space Shuttle fleet, were designed based on the dimensions of the rear ends of two Roman horses. I’m not joking. Stay with me. The boosters had to ship by rail to the launch site. The rail route went through tunnels. The tunnels were sized for the trains. The trains were the gauge of the railway, which is 4 feet 8.5 inches. That weird number didn’t come from anywhere obvious. The British set it because the people who built the first...