|
hi Reader - Many moons ago, I studied improv theater in New York City. If you arent familiar with it, here’s how it works: You walk onstage with four or five people. The audience gives you one word. And from that, your job is to build a full 10-minute theatrical production. No script. No props. No plan. In one of my first classes, I took the word “cabbage”… “Hey, I’m a talking cabbage at a job interview. “Hi hiring manager, you are a carrot talking to me.” “Oh hey, there is ranch dressing in the break room.” I thought it was funny. The audience didn’t laugh. My teammates looked confused. And my teacher said: “What the __ are you doing?” She wasn’t wrong. Then she said something that changed how I saw the whole thing: “The goal isn’t to invent new things. It’s to build on what you already have. …and… When in doubt, ask yourself: ‘If this is true… what else is true?’ Next time, I played it differently. Same word: cabbage. This time, it’s a kitchen. A stubborn grandmother. A distracted grandson playing. A family recipe passed down—or lost. We went one line at a time. Listening to my partners. Building. Adding gradually to what came before. Not going crazy with improbable, impossible, unfunny premises. And somehow… it all made sense. And it felt… MAGICAL… to see a 10 minute play emerge from ONE word. Not because it was wild. But because it was grounded. We built something that made sense within the truth of the world. Sooo what does this all have to do with creative strategy?I saw a post recently: “20 formats you MUST test in your ad account.” And look, I get the temptation. But if you’ve ever run real spend through Meta, you know the reality: 19(heck, 20) of those formats will bomb. You’ll burn time, money, and energy. That’s cabbage-at-a-job-interview energy. Most marketers try to reinvent the wheel. New concept. New format. New world. Every time. But the top 1%? They don’t invent from scratch. They build off what’s already working. They start with one proven ad. And they ask: “If this is true… what else is true?” New hook. New angle. Different structure. Same core concept. And yes: they do chase net new concepts, the blue ocean stuff… to pursue ideas that havent tested before, to try new things. BUT not without nailing what is already working. That’s why we built Brute Force AI. It’s our internal tool to deconstruct what’s actually performing… either in your own top ads, or in the most common patterns we see in the Meta Ads Library. No theories. No wild guesses. Just clear signals. Real performance, reversed and rebuilt. It’s improv for ads: we’ve trained the machine to ask: “If this is true… what else is true?” And then keep building. …which is how we get results like this… If you are spending $50k a month, and want to start scaling effectively and profitably…. Hit reply with “IMPROV.” We’ll show you how to unleash creative wins in a way that ‘bottles the magic’ of your current performers AND surfaces net new ideas. Later, Shamanth |
Intelligent Artifice features hard won insights from the front-lines of performance marketing in a Generative AI world - delivered straight into your inbox. For free.
Hi Reader - I've scaled tens of products well past a million a month in ad spend: both in-house and agency-side, and here's what's funny about operating at that level. Every measurement argument you see online stops mattering. The guy with 2k followers and a ring light who cracked the code with a new lookalike stack. The "I scaled a brand to six figures, here are my 9 CBO learnings" guy. The targeting hack that changes everything until Meta deprecates it in March. Nobody at a million a month...
Hi Reader - While LinkedIn bros the world over have been going 'RIP designers,' I've been having more and more conversations like the below lately. Here is what they were expecting me to say Some clever stack of AI tools wired together with prompts. Maybe a word-salad about 'skills' and 'agents' or 'n8n workflows'. While what we actually do is boring. We use the standard AI models(same as your favorite LinkedIn bro). Then we hand all of it to human designers & strategists. The designers &...
Hi Reader - I was not a programmer. My entire technical background was: ‘hire a developer and hope for the best’. As of a year and a half ago, my big AI move was exporting a CSV from my MMP, uploading it to ChatGPT, and asking it questions about my performance data. I thought I was ahead of the curve. I was very proud of myself. Turns out I was doing pivot tables with a chat interface on top. Something changed though. I started writing code with AI. I now spend 35 to 40 hours a week on my...