|
Hello [FULL_NAME GOES HERE] …”until one day, we turned off our top creative by mistake….and nobody noticed this for the next few days...” ….and lo-and-behold… “Our retention started going up…. Our engagement metrics started improving….” What the hell was happening here? I was talking to a founder who had just dodged a bullet. As I’m sure you are aware, Meta’s algorithm typically allocates the majority of spend toward the top few ads(if you’re curious about going into the weeds, check out this article I wrote for Mobile Dev Memo sometime ago). The top ad(and its variants) for this product had a ton of spend. It had strong CPI, strong ROAS as reported by Meta - and strong d0 ROAS as reported by the MMP. …which made sense. The ad was on-trend, clickbaity - and it clearly brought the users in. …but it turned out, the kinds of users the ad brought in were NOT the kinds of users who would stay, and retain in the app. Ouch. As dating coaches and life coaches have said since time immemorial: “be careful who you attract.” This founder had dodged a bullet, but I’ve known a number of others who hadnt. If you arent careful in having your ads optimize for the *right* downstream metrics, your product might go up in flames - *and* you might never know why. The lesson here isnt just that you should avoid building clickbaity ads(there can be times and places where they do work). The point is that you should never trust a machine(or an inept human) to make 100% of a critical decision for you. This is something we drill into our team as we embrace all things AI. This is why, while we wholeheartedly embrace all things AI, and dive really deep, we use (our very human) expertise and judgment to make calls & decisions. This is why all our work infuses our experience with 10,000+ ads, $100mm in ad spend and all the pattern matching that we’ve built up over more than a decade: and uses AI not to replace our experience but to augment it. If you’re interested in unlocking these kinds of creative wins that unlock massive growth for your product(s), we’re now offering a free creative strategy audit, in which we do a deep dive of your ad creatives, testing strategy, messaging, structure - and every element of what makes your ad creatives tick: and help you supercharge these for performance with our wonderful humans - and magical AI. That way we remain laser-focused on the *actual* downstream metrics that matter to you - and lead to profitability and sustained growth, not just upfunnel quasi-vanity metrics. If you’re interested, hit reply and tell me more about your situation. I read every email. Cheers, Shamanth. PS: Check out our latest resources: This episode dives deep into the critical aspects of mobile app growth, focusing on why retention, rather than immediate monetization, is pivotal for apps at various growth stages.
​ Join us for an hour of fun conversations around mobile marketing. If you're attending the MWC, don't forget to come say hi!
|
Intelligent Artifice features hard won insights from the front-lines of performance marketing in a Generative AI world - delivered straight into your inbox. For free.
Hi Reader - Last week I wrote about the AI creative strategy agent we open-sourced and why it doesn't replace humans. One of the questions we got on the post was: How do you feed back performance? Short answer: same shape as the agent. The longer answer is more interesting, because performance analysis isn't actually one job. It's two completely different jobs at two completely different altitudes, and most teams treat it as one and end up doing neither well. Both altitudes can run...
Hi Reader - We open-sourced our AI creative strategy agent last week, and I was actually a little nervous about it. Because a lot of people would be thinking - if not saying this. "Great. Now you can fire half your creative team, right?" That's the assumption baked into every "AI agent" launch on LinkedIn right now. You plug it in, watch the headcount line on the org chart get a little shorter, and spend an extra five minutes on the beach. The honest answer is no. The opposite, actually. And...
Hi Reader - The booster rockets on the entire United States Space Shuttle fleet, were designed based on the dimensions of the rear ends of two Roman horses. I’m not joking. Stay with me. The boosters had to ship by rail to the launch site. The rail route went through tunnels. The tunnels were sized for the trains. The trains were the gauge of the railway, which is 4 feet 8.5 inches. That weird number didn’t come from anywhere obvious. The British set it because the people who built the first...